Using Position Sizing Analysis to Improve Discipline
Guide to tracking planned versus actual position sizes and understanding the financial impact of sizing deviations.
Position sizing analysis compares your planned size for each trade against what you actually executed. The deviation between the two reveals important behavioural patterns.
Accessing the Dashboard
Navigate to Analytics then Position Sizing. The dashboard requires that you log both planned and actual position sizes (the planned size can be auto-calculated from your risk rules and stop distance).
The Deviation Chart
The primary chart shows each trade as a bar:
The Deviation Distribution
A histogram showing how your sizing deviations distribute:
Impact Analysis
The Impact tab shows three figures:
Oversizing Cost
The total extra P&L lost on trades where you sized larger than planned and the trade lost. This is money you would have saved with disciplined sizing.
Undersizing Cost
The total P&L you missed on trades where you sized smaller than planned and the trade won. This is opportunity cost from fear.
Net Impact
The combined effect. For most traders, this is negative—sizing indiscipline is a net cost.
Context Breakdowns
After Wins vs After Losses
Do you size up after winning (confidence effect) or after losing (revenge effect)? The chart shows your average deviation in each context.
By Confidence Level
If your high-confidence trades show +30% oversizing, your confidence is leaking into your position sizing beyond what the plan allows.
By Time of Day
Do you maintain sizing discipline throughout the session or does it deteriorate? Many traders oversize in the afternoon as fatigue reduces discipline.
Setting Up Alerts
In Settings then Risk Alerts:
Improving Sizing Discipline
For the complete analysis of sizing behaviour, read our blog post on [Position Sizing Discipline: Planned vs Actual Analysis](/blog/position-sizing-discipline-analysis).